Messages in this thread | | | From | Vincent Guittot <> | Date | Wed, 16 Mar 2016 10:16:21 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/8] sched/cpufreq: pass sched class into cpufreq_update_util |
| |
On 16 March 2016 at 09:53, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:29:59AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> I wonder if it's really worth passing per sched_class request to >> sched_util ? sched_util is about selecting a frequency based on the >> utilization of the CPU, it only needs a value that reflect the whole >> utilization. Can't we sum (or whatever the formula we want to apply) >> utilizations before calling cpufreq_update_util > > So I've thought the same; but I'm conflicted, its a shame to compute > anything if the call then doesn't do anything with it.
yes, at least we shoud skip all that stuff (including adding a margin) if no hook has been set in cpufreq_update_util. I also see potential optimization of updating the value only if the utilization has been decayed
> > And keeping a structure of all the various numbers to pass in also has > cost of yet another cacheline to touch.
| |