Messages in this thread | | | From | Steve French <> | Date | Tue, 15 Mar 2016 22:28:44 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v18 00/22] Richacls (Core and Ext4) |
| |
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:45:14AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:11:03AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> > People have long learned that we only have 'alloc' permissions. Any >> > model that mixes allow and deny ACE is a mistake. >> >> People can also learn and change though :-). One of the >> biggest complaints people deploying Samba on Linux have is the >> incompatible ACL models. > > Just to confirm: I see this a lot in the field. NFSv4 ACLs, while not a > perfect match for NTFS ACLs are a lot closer much more usable to people > who want to serve Windows clients.
Yes (and presumably Macs as well)
-- Thanks,
Steve
| |