Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm/pat: Change pat_disable() to emulate PAT table | From | Toshi Kani <> | Date | Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:43:15 -0600 |
| |
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 11:01 +0000, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:11:16PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > > - pat = PAT(0, WB) | PAT(1, WT) | PAT(2, UC_MINUS) | PAT(3, UC) > > | > > - PAT(4, WB) | PAT(5, WT) | PAT(6, UC_MINUS) | PAT(7, UC); > > + if (cpu_has_pat) { > > Please use on init paths boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT) and on fast paths > static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT). No more of that cpu_has_XXX ugliness.
'cpu_has_pat' is defined as 'boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)'. Do you mean it should explicitly use 'boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PAT)'?
Thanks, -Toshi
| |