lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: coccinelle: generalized removal of unnecessary pointer casts?
From
Date
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I wrote a little cocci script to remove unnecessary
> > casts for memset and memcpy (below) and tested it on
> > linux kernel's drivers/staging/ directory.
> > 
> > For instance, when dst and src are already pointers:
> > 
> > -     memcpy((u8 *)dst, (u8 *)src, r8712_get_wlan_bssid_ex_sz(src));
> > +     memcpy(dst, src, r8712_get_wlan_bssid_ex_sz(src));
> > 
> > It works ok, (it doesn't remove unnecessary parentheses
> > around the pointers) but it makes me wonder if there's a
> > generalized spatch mechanism to remove casts when an
> > arbitrary function takes a void * in any argument
> > position and a call to that function uses a cast of a
> > pointer to any pointer type for that argument.
> > 
> > $ cat remove_mem_casts.cocci 
> > @@
> > type t;
> > t *p;
> > type v;
> > expression e1;
> > expression e2;
> > @@
> > 
> > -     memset((v*)p, e1, e2)
> > +     memset(p, e1, e2)
> > 
> > @@
> > type t;
> > t *p;
> > type v;
> > expression e1;
> > expression e2;
> > @@
> > 
> > -     memcpy((v*)p, e1, e2)
> > +     memcpy(p, e1, e2)
> > 
> > @@
> > type t;
> > t *p;
> > type v;
> > expression e1;
> > expression e2;
> > @@
> > 
> > -     memcpy(e1, (v*)p, e2)
> > +     memcpy(e1, p, e2)
> > 
> > @@
> > type t1;
> > type t2;
> > t1 *p1;
> > t2 *p2;
> > type v1;
> > type v2;
> > expression e1;
> > @@
> > 
> > -     memcpy((v1*)p1, (v2*)p2, e1)
> > +     memcpy(p1, p2, e1)
>
> This should do everything:
>
> @@
> identifier f;
> expression *e;
> type T;
> @@
>
> f(...,
> - (T *)(
>   e
> - )
>   ,...)
>
> @@
> identifier f;
> expression *e;
> type T;
> @@
>
> f(...,
> - (T *)
>   e
>   ,...)
>
> julia

Hi Julia,

I think your proposed script is not correct.
The function must take a void * argument.
There's no validation of that here.

cheers, Joe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-14 23:41    [W:0.060 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site