lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] rtc: s3c: Don't print an error on probe deferral
From
Date
Hello Joe,

On 03/14/2016 05:03 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 16:59 -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> I don't think they make little sense now since even a non-native english
>> speaker like me can understand it :)
>
> That's a non sequitur if ever I read one.
>

I was trying to be funny but it seems that I failed.

>> But yes, it's cryptic at the very least. That's the problem with long text
>> and the 80 char limit to make checkpatch.pl happy. I guess I can just move
>> the message a little bit even if that will make to not be properly aligned.
>
> There's no issue with longer than 80 column lines
> for these messages. checkpatch wouldn't complain.
>

Great, I didn't know that checkpatch had an exception for the 80 column
rule. I'll post a v2 then.

Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-14 22:01    [W:0.076 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site