lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] pfn_t: Change the encoding
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:40:20PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Matthew Wilcox
> <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com> wrote:
> > By moving the flag bits to the bottom, we encourage commonality
> > between SGs with pages and those using pfn_t. We can also then insert
> > a pfn_t into a radix tree, as it uses the same two bits for indirect &
> > exceptional indicators.
>
> It's not immediately clear to me what we gain with SG entry
> commonality. The down side is that we lose the property that
> pfn_to_pfn_t() is a nop. This was Dave's suggestion so that the
> nominal case did not change the binary layout of a typical pfn.

I understand that motivation!

> Can we just bit swizzle a pfn_t on insertion/retrieval from the radix?

Of course we *can*, but we end up doing more swizzling that way than we
do this way. In the Brave New Future where we're storing pfn_t in the
radix tree, on a page fault we find the pfn_t in the radix tree then
we want to insert it into the page tables. So DAX would first have to
convert the radix tree entry to a pfn_t, then the page table code has to
convert the pfn_t into a pte/pmd/pud (which we currently do by converting
a pfn_t to a pfn, then converting the pfn to a pte/pmd/pud, but I assume
that either the compiler optimises that into a single conversion, or we'll
add pfn_t_pte to each architecture in future if it's actually a problem).

Much easier to look up a pfn_t in the radix tree and pass it directly
to vm_insert_mixed().

If there's any part of the kernel that is doing a *lot* of conversion
between pfn_t and pfn, that surely indicates a place in the kernel where
we need to convert an interface from pfn to pfn_t.

(It occurs to me we can make the code simpler on architectures that
don't support PUDs. The PFN_HUGE bit is still available to distinguish
between PMDs and PTEs, but we won't need to clear the bottom bit of the
PFN if PFN_HUGE is set, since nobody can add a PUD pfn to the radix tree).

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-12 20:01    [W:0.068 / U:0.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site