lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: runtime regression with "x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is disabled"
From
Date


On 11/03/2016 14:40, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 01:23:56PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> > Pentium Pro has MTRR, PAT came later.
> Yep, this page says so too:
>
> http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Pentium-II/Intel-Pentium%20Pro%20200%201%20MB%20-%20GJ80521EX200%201M%20%28BP80521200%201M%29.html
>
>> > I believe the qemu32 CPU isn't a "real" CPU type therefore.
> And why is that so? I suspect it has again something to do with
> migration and fun. Let me add the kvm ML.
>
> Guys, does anyone have an idea why
>
> #define PPRO_FEATURES (CPUID_FP87 | CPUID_DE | CPUID_PSE | CPUID_TSC | \
> CPUID_MSR | CPUID_MCE | CPUID_CX8 | CPUID_PGE | CPUID_CMOV | \
> CPUID_PAT | CPUID_FXSR | CPUID_MMX | CPUID_SSE | CPUID_SSE2 | \
> CPUID_PAE | CPUID_SEP | CPUID_APIC)
>
> has CPUID_PAT *instead* of CPUID_MTRR?

Somebody got it wrong 10-ish years ago, and nobody has ever checked since.

But, don't use qemu32 or qemu64. Use kvm32 and kvm64, or better
something like the host you run on ("-cpu Nehalem", "-cpu SandyBridge",
"-cpu Haswell-noTSX" etc.).

I really, really should fix those defaults...

Paolo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-11 21:01    [W:0.080 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site