lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm, pmem: clear poison on write
Date
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 14:47 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> If a write is directed at a known bad block perform the following:
>
> 1/ write the data
>
> 2/ send a clear poison command
>
> 3/ invalidate the poison out of the cache hierarchy
>
> Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h |    5 +++++
>  drivers/nvdimm/bus.c        |   46
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/nvdimm/nd.h         |    2 ++
>  drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c       |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/pmem.h        |   19 ++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h
> index c57fd1ea9689..bf8b35d2035a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pmem.h

<>

>  static int pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem, struct page *page,
>   unsigned int len, unsigned int off, int rw,
>   sector_t sector)
>  {
>   int rc = 0;
> + bool bad_pmem = false;
>   void *mem = kmap_atomic(page);
>   phys_addr_t pmem_off = sector * 512 + pmem->data_offset;
>   void __pmem *pmem_addr = pmem->virt_addr + pmem_off;
>  
> + if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
> + bad_pmem = true;
> +
>   if (rw == READ) {
> - if (unlikely(is_bad_pmem(&pmem->bb, sector, len)))
> + if (unlikely(bad_pmem))
>   rc = -EIO;
>   else {
>   memcpy_from_pmem(mem + off, pmem_addr, len);
> @@ -81,6 +104,10 @@ static int pmem_do_bvec(struct pmem_device *pmem,
> struct page *page,
>   } else {
>   flush_dcache_page(page);
>   memcpy_to_pmem(pmem_addr, mem + off, len);
> + if (unlikely(bad_pmem)) {
> + pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
> + memcpy_to_pmem(pmem_addr, mem + off, len);
> + }
>   }

Just noticed this -- why do we memcpy_to_pmem twice in the error case?
Sh
ouldn't it be:

if (unlikely(bad_pmem))
pmem_clear_poison(pmem, pmem_off, len);
memcpy_to_pmem(pmem_addr, mem + off, len);


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-11 02:21    [W:0.095 / U:0.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site