Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | Subject | [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Remove WARs for handling of_get_named_gpio() return | Date | Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:42:46 +0530 |
| |
The GPIO interface of_get_named_gpio() has implemented the proper error returns even EPROBE_DEFER and hence caller need not to implement any WAR for translating the returned error.
Remove the WAR implemented in fixed regulator to handle the return of of_get_named_gpio().
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
--- As per comment, it is said that patch is already posted. If the patch is active then please add my Tested-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
drivers/regulator/fixed.c | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/fixed.c b/drivers/regulator/fixed.c index ff62d69..988a747 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/fixed.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/fixed.c @@ -79,18 +79,8 @@ of_get_fixed_voltage_config(struct device *dev, config->enabled_at_boot = true; config->gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio", 0); - /* - * of_get_named_gpio() currently returns ENODEV rather than - * EPROBE_DEFER. This code attempts to be compatible with both - * for now; the ENODEV check can be removed once the API is fixed. - * of_get_named_gpio() doesn't differentiate between a missing - * property (which would be fine here, since the GPIO is optional) - * and some other error. Patches have been posted for both issues. - * Once they are check in, we should replace this with: - * if (config->gpio < 0 && config->gpio != -ENOENT) - */ - if ((config->gpio == -ENODEV) || (config->gpio == -EPROBE_DEFER)) - return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); + if ((config->gpio < 0) && (config->gpio != -ENOENT)) + return ERR_PTR(config->gpio); of_property_read_u32(np, "startup-delay-us", &config->startup_delay); -- 2.1.4
| |