| Date | Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:10:24 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits() |
| |
On 07-02-16, 16:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to > get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the > reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is > actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy > object directy via its argument. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Why the hell did we write it that way earlier ? :)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-- viresh
|