lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] prctl: Add PR_SET_TIMERSLACK_PID for setting timer slack of an arbitrary thread.
From
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:13 -0800 John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Morton
>> <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> IOW, it would be more consistent to add sys_set_timer_slack()?
>>
>> I'm fine with moving this way.
>>
>> Ruchi/Rom: Any objections to that idea?
>>
>> Thomas/Arjan: Any other functionality we should consider including
>> when adding a syscall to tweak timer slack?
>
> A syscall is quite a bit more fuss - implement it on x86_64, provide a
> no-op default in sys_ni.c, add a test suite into
> tools/testing/selftests (mainly for arch maintainers), wait for the
> various arch maintainers to wire it up.

Yea. It is. And I'm not excited to start over on this, but this
functionality has already run into trouble in the Android tree, as the
PR_SET_TIMERSLACK_PID value has hit multiple collisions over time. So
this functionality upstream would help resolve that pain.

> Fortunately the build system now emits little messages which tell
> maintainers that there's a new syscall which needs looking at.
>
> And a manpage will be needed, but a prctl manpage patch would have been
> needed anyway.

Yea.

thanks
-john

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-05 22:01    [W:0.053 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site