Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:32:58 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator |
| |
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:33:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you > > > prefer.
> > Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say.
> Just to make sure we're on the same page: you want to keep the > regulator, but instead of giving the parent through vinX-supplies > properties, you want to have a single *-supply property, with a list > of regulators, right?
Either that or an explicit regulator describing the merge. Rob wants the list I think but I really don't care. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |