Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:58:53 +0100 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 00/26] perf tools: Introduce hists specific format entries |
| |
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:42:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:22:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Ok, so I rebased it on top of my perf/core branch, adjusting some stuff > > wrt recent patchkits from Namhyung (hist_entry__callchain_fprintf() is > > no more, etc), and renaming that perf_hpp_list->{list,sort_list} to > > ->{fields,sorts} as Namhyung suggested and you agreed, it builds... > > > > But perf top isn't showing the overhead column... there were some > > changes to perf report in this patchkit to move some initializations... > > will check there... > > Fixed, doing the same change you made for 'perf report', moving the > setup_sorting call to after the setup_browser one, inserted a new patch > with that just before the patch where the problem was bisected, please > check. > > To recap: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list&id=7d105448f8922679956728a7f5106218378c450e
I'll check on that, thanks a lot
jirka
| |