Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:15:50 -0800 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? |
| |
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:09:38PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > Hey guys, > > kernel.org lists linux 4.4.1 as "stable" but the releases page lists > it as a long term stable kernel. Which one is true?
Both :)
It hasn't had the "chance" to be a longterm stable kernel given that there hasn't been anything to replace it yet :)
But you are right, I'll go submit a patch to the releases page to mark it as a longterm kernel so that people don't get confused.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |