Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:31:41 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [patch 07/11] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data |
| |
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Do you have any data to back that up or is that just "believe" ? > > I've seen systems with discontiguous apic ids before. > > It is obvious if you consider setups with node hotplug.
Right, but if you have 1024 maximal cores and
> BTW reading this thread you don't seem interested in any code review > feedback, attacking everyone, not bothering to look up data sheets,
I did look up data sheets, but I assumed that IVB is the same. But that's what reviews are for.
> not understanding the hardware you're changing the driver for, etc.
Oh well.
> Why do you even bother to post the patches?
Just to annoy you.
Thanks,
tglx
| |