lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 07/11] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > Do you have any data to back that up or is that just "believe" ?
>
> I've seen systems with discontiguous apic ids before.
>
> It is obvious if you consider setups with node hotplug.

Right, but if you have 1024 maximal cores and

> BTW reading this thread you don't seem interested in any code review
> feedback, attacking everyone, not bothering to look up data sheets,

I did look up data sheets, but I assumed that IVB is the same. But that's what
reviews are for.

> not understanding the hardware you're changing the driver for, etc.

Oh well.

> Why do you even bother to post the patches?

Just to annoy you.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-18 00:01    [W:0.199 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site