lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:02:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> I personally find very little value in them but there are definitely
> people who care about them judging by the patches I get when they go out
> of sync.

idk, istr this coming up some months ago and there really weren't good
arguments for furthering out-of-line generated docs. I'm sure there
are people building and checking for errors but that doesn't indicate
the actual usefulness or that we shouldn't move away from it.

Thanks.

--
tejun

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-17 18:21    [W:0.121 / U:2.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site