Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:29 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler |
| |
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:02:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > I personally find very little value in them but there are definitely > people who care about them judging by the patches I get when they go out > of sync.
idk, istr this coming up some months ago and there really weren't good arguments for furthering out-of-line generated docs. I'm sure there are people building and checking for errors but that doesn't indicate the actual usefulness or that we shouldn't move away from it.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |