lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3] i2c: i801: Adding Intel Lewisburg support for iTCO
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:42:31AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Alexandra,
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:22:44 -0800, Alexandra Yates wrote:
> > Changes log v2 to v3: Clarified commit message. No changes in code.

This line should be below the "---".

> >
> > Starting from Intel Sunrisepoint (Skylake PCH) the iTCO watchdog
> > resources have been moved to reside under the i801 SMBus host
> > controller whereas previously they were under the LPC device.
> >
> > This patch adds Intel lewisburg SMBus support for iTCO device.
> > It allows to load watchdog dynamically when the hardware is
> > present. This patch is an addition
> > to cdc5a3110e7c3ae793f367285789a6bc39c962dc i2c: i801: "add
> > Intel Lewisburg device IDs".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandra Yates <alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> > index f62d697..27fa0cb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> > @@ -1271,6 +1271,8 @@ static int i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> > switch (dev->device) {
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SUNRISEPOINT_H_SMBUS:
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SUNRISEPOINT_LP_SMBUS:
> > + case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LEWISBURG_SMBUS:
> > + case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LEWISBURG_SSKU_SMBUS:
> > case PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DNV_SMBUS:
> > priv->features |= FEATURE_I2C_BLOCK_READ;
> > priv->features |= FEATURE_IRQ;
>
> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
>
> Note this checkpatch warning though:
>
> ERROR: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit 0123456789ab ("commit description")'
> #40:
> to cdc5a3110e7c3ae793f367285789a6bc39c962dc i2c: i801: "add
>
> It is also common to add a "Fixes:" line with that information so that
> patch backporting can be automated. And as I said before I would tag
> the patch for stable as well.

Can you do this and resend?

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-12 20:21    [W:0.091 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site