lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] Add BUG_XX() debugging options
From
On 2/1/16, kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on v4.5-rc2]
> [also build test WARNING on next-20160201]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improving the system]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jeffrey-Merkey/Add-BUG_XX-debugging-options/20160202-040506
> config: x86_64-randconfig-x012-201605 (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
> from kernel/bounds.c:9:
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>> defined [-Wundef]
> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
> ^
> --
> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/page-flags.h:9,
> from kernel/bounds.c:9:
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>> defined [-Wundef]
> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
> ^
> In file included from include/linux/bug.h:4:0,
> from include/linux/crypto.h:23,
> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:8:
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:14:5: warning: "CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG" is not
>>> defined [-Wundef]
> #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
> ^
>
> vim +/CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG +14 arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>
> 1 #ifndef _ASM_X86_BUG_H
> 2 #define _ASM_X86_BUG_H
> 3
> 4 #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> 5
> 6 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> 7
> 8 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> 9 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b, %c0\n"
> 10 #else
> 11 # define __BUG_C0 "2:\t.long 1b - 2b, %c0 - 2b\n"
> 12 #endif
> 13
> > 14 #if CONFIG_DEBUG_BUG
> 15 #define BUG() \
> 16 do { \
> 17 asm volatile("int3"); \
> 18 unreachable(); \
> 19 } while (0)
> 20 #else
> 21 #define BUG() \
> 22 do { \
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology
> Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> Corporation
>


I am looking at this one, but I'm not sure what the point is of
running a test to build something where the defines are ignored. Is
this file off limits to use CONFIG options in the build?

Jeff

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-02-01 21:41    [W:0.058 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site