Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Dec 2016 04:46:08 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v3] xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries |
| |
* Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> On 05/12/16 18:49, Alex Thorlton wrote: > > This is the third pass at my patchset to fix up our problems with > > XENMEM_machine_memory_map on large systems. The only changes on this > > pass were to flesh out the comment above the E820_X_MAX definition, and > > to add Juergen's Reviewed-by to the second patch. > > > > Let me know if anyone has any questions/comments! > > > > Alex Thorlton (2): > > x86: Make E820_X_MAX unconditionally larger than E820MAX > > xen/x86: Increase xen_e820_map to E820_X_MAX possible entries > > > > arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h | 12 ++++++++---- > > arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 6 +++--- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > Ingo, do you have any preferences through which tree those patches > should go? I'd like to have at least patch 2 in 4.10, so I could take > it through the Xen tree.
Sure, both are fine to me:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
| |