lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: simple-card-utils: enable clocks/clock-names/clock-ranges
Date

Hi Stephen

> > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> >
> > Current simple-card is supporting this style for clocks
> >
> > sound {
> > ...
> > simple-audio-card,cpu {
> > sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> > clocks = <&cpu_clock>;
> > };
> > simple-audio-card,codec {
> > sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> > clocks = <&codec_clock>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Now, it can support this style too, because we can use
> > devm_get_clk_from_child() now.
> >
> > sound {
> > ...
> > clocks = <&cpu_clock>, <&codec_clock>;
> > clock-names = "cpu", "codec";
> > clock-ranges;
> > ...
> > simple-audio-card,cpu {
> > sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> > };
> > simple-audio-card,codec {
> > sound-dai = <&xxx>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
>
> I don't see any reason why we need this patch though. The binding
> works as is, so supporting different styles doesn't seem like a
> good idea to me. Let's just keep what we have? Even if a sub-node
> like cpu or codec gets more than one element in the clocks list
> property, we can make that work by passing a clock-name then
> based on some sort of other knowledge.

OK, thanks. Let's skip this patch.
But I believe this idea itself is not wrong (?)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-09 01:22    [W:0.064 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site