lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 10:11 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Today there are two implementations of hugetlbpages which are managed
> by exclusive #ifdefs:
> * FSL_BOOKE: several directory entries points to the same single hugepage
> * BOOK3S: one upper level directory entry points to a table of hugepages
>
> In preparation of implementation of hugepage support on the 8xx, we
> need a mix of the two above solutions, because the 8xx needs both cases
> depending on the size of pages:
> * In 4k page size mode, each PGD entry covers a 4M bytes area. It means
> that 2 PGD entries will be necessary to cover an 8M hugepage while a
> single PGD entry will cover 8x 512k hugepages.
> * In 16 page size mode, each PGD entry covers a 64M bytes area. It means
> that 8x 8M hugepages will be covered by one PGD entry and 64x 512k
> hugepages will be covers by one PGD entry.
>
> This patch:
> * removes #ifdefs in favor of if/else based on the range sizes
> * merges the two huge_pte_alloc() functions as they are pretty similar
> * merges the two hugetlbpage_init() functions as they are pretty similar
[snip]
> @@ -860,16 +803,34 @@ static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
>    * if we have pdshift and shift value same, we don't
>    * use pgt cache for hugepd.
>    */
> - if (pdshift != shift) {
> + if (pdshift > shift) {
>   pgtable_cache_add(pdshift - shift, NULL);
>   if (!PGT_CACHE(pdshift - shift))
>   panic("hugetlbpage_init(): could not create
> "
>         "pgtable cache for %d bit
> pagesize\n", shift);
>   }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> + else if (!hugepte_cache) {

This else never triggers on book3e, because the way this function calculates
pdshift is wrong for book3e (it uses PyD_SHIFT instead of HUGEPD_PxD_SHIFT).
 We later get OOMs because huge_pte_alloc() calculates pdshift correctly,
tries to use hugepte_cache, and fails.

If the point of this patch is to remove the compile-time decision on whether
to do things the book3e way, why are there still ifdefs such as the ones
controlling the definition of HUGEPD_PxD_SHIFT?  How does what you're doing on
8xx (for certain page sizes) differ from book3e?

-Scott

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-12-06 02:23    [W:0.136 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site