Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: da850: fix da850_set_pll0rate() | From | Sekhar Nori <> | Date | Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:13:42 +0530 |
| |
On Monday 05 December 2016 03:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > This function is confusing - its second argument is an index to the > freq table, not the requested clock rate in Hz, but it's used as the > set_rate callback for the pll0 clock. It leads to an oops when the > caller doesn't know the internals and passes the rate in Hz as > argument instead of the cpufreq index since this argument isn't bounds > checked either. > > Fix it by iterating over the array of supported frequencies and > selecting a one that matches or returning -EINVAL for unsupported > rates. > > Also: update the davinci cpufreq driver. It's the only user of this > clock and currently it passes the cpufreq table index to > clk_set_rate(), which is confusing. Make it pass the requested clock > rate in Hz. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/cpufreq/davinci-cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index 006ec56..9837541 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -1179,14 +1179,26 @@ static int da850_set_armrate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > return clk_set_rate(pllclk, index); > } > > -static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long index) > +static int da850_set_pll0rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) > { > - unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > - struct da850_opp *opp; > struct pll_data *pll = clk->pll_data; > + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq; > + unsigned int prediv, mult, postdiv; > + struct da850_opp *opp = NULL; > int ret; > > - opp = (struct da850_opp *) cpufreq_info.freq_table[index].driver_data; > + for (freq = da850_freq_table; > + freq->frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; freq++) { > + /* rate is in Hz, freq->frequency is in KHz */ > + if (freq->frequency == rate / 1000) {
Or rate = rate / 1000;
before the loop begins? The idea behind my comment was mostly to reduce the amount of calculation in the loop.
Thanks, Sekhar
| |