Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Dec 2016 17:55:13 +0100 | From | Antonio Ospite <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data |
| |
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:30:52 +0100 Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
> Hello. >
Hi everyone,
> On 25.11.2016 20:53, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> writes: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> On 24.11.2016 17:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910, > >>> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a > >>> configuration with only a910: > >>> > >>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function) > >>> > >>> This moves the definition into its own section. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data") > >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > >> > >> I wonder what we should do with ezx.c. > >> > >> As far as I know neither Daniel nor Harald or myself are doing anything > >> with this devices anymore. Besides a basic compile test having an ack or > >> reviewed by from our side is a bit worthless. :/ > >> > >> I should still have some of these phones around in a box somewhere. If > >> there is someone with a good motivation and time to take over on this > >> platform we will find a way to get the person this devices. > >> > >> Any takers? Robert? I guess you are already overloaded but you might > >> also have an interest. Worth asking :) > > Oh yes, I'm very interested in your box. Besides I really like old platforms > > :) > > > Great! I should have at least 3 or 4 different devices from the EZX > platform around. I will go and search for the box over the weekend :) > > >> In the case nobody wants to pick up here what would you consider the > >> bets way forward? I could send a patch removing ezx platform support > >> from the kernel (basically ezx.c plus build support) or I can send a > >> patch marking it at least orphan in MAINTAINERS. Let me know what you think. > >> > >> Daniel, Harald, if one of you is still interested in these and what to > >> pick up the work again, please speak up now. :) > > Unless another maintainer steps in, you can submit a patch to transfer the > > maintainance onto me, and we'll see off mailing lists how we could arange the > > boards transfer. > > I cc'ed another developer who did a lot of work regarding EZX. > > Antonio, as you can see from the mail above we are pondering what who > will maintain the ezx platform in the kernel going forward. Neither > Daniel, Harald or me is going to do so. If you have time, interest and > motivation to do so please speak up. I know life moved on and you ahve > other projects and interests so do not feel pressured here. Just say no > if you have no interest. Robert already agreed to act as a fallback so > we would still be safe. :) >
I still use a Motorola A1200 with the original EZX stack as my main phone (and that tells something about how much I use a phone...) however I haven't touched any OpenEZX stuff in a while.
I don't think I am going to play with these devices anytime soon, but I can provide Robert any info he may need about OpenEZX, the development tools and the out-of-tree patches required to make the phones somewhat usable.
I have an off-line backup of the OpenEZX wiki as well if that should be needed.
Robert, feel free to contact me off-list any time. I also still hang out in the #openezx IRC channel on Freenode.
Ciao ciao, Antonio
-- Antonio Ospite https://ao2.it https://twitter.com/ao2it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
| |