Messages in this thread | | | From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> | Date | Fri, 16 Dec 2016 23:18:48 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] siphash: add cryptographically secure PRF |
| |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:13 PM, George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> wrote: > Remembering that on "real" machines it's full SipHash, then I'd say that > 64-bit security + rekeying seems reasonable.
64-bit security for an RNG is not reasonable even with rekeying. No no no. Considering we already have a massive speed-up here with the secure version, there's zero reason to start weakening the security because we're trigger happy with our benchmarks. No no no.
| |