Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V7 5/8] arm64/dma-mapping: Implement DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED | From | Robin Murphy <> | Date | Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:46:21 +0000 |
| |
On 13/12/16 14:38, Sricharan wrote: > Hi Robin, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-arm-kernel [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Robin Murphy >> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 7:33 PM >> To: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>; jcrouse@codeaurora.org; pdaly@codeaurora.org; jgebben@codeaurora.org; >> joro@8bytes.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; pratikp@codeaurora.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; tzeng@codeaurora.org; >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; will.deacon@arm.com; mitchelh@codeaurora.org; vinod.koul@intel.com >> Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 5/8] arm64/dma-mapping: Implement DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED >> >> On 12/12/16 18:38, Sricharan R wrote: >>> From: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> >>> >>> The newly added DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED is useful for creating mappings that >>> are only accessible to privileged DMA engines. Implement it in >>> dma-iommu.c so that the ARM64 DMA IOMMU mapper can make use of it. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >>> Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >>> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@codeaurora.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 6 +++--- >>> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 10 ++++++++-- >>> include/linux/dma-iommu.h | 3 ++- >>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >>> index 401f79a..ae76ead 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >>> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void *__iommu_alloc_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, >>> unsigned long attrs) >>> { >>> bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev); >>> - int ioprot = dma_direction_to_prot(DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, coherent); >>> + int ioprot = dma_info_to_prot(DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, coherent, attrs); >>> size_t iosize = size; >>> void *addr; >>> >>> @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static dma_addr_t __iommu_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page, >>> unsigned long attrs) >>> { >>> bool coherent = is_device_dma_coherent(dev); >>> - int prot = dma_direction_to_prot(dir, coherent); >>> + int prot = dma_info_to_prot(dir, coherent, attrs); >>> dma_addr_t dev_addr = iommu_dma_map_page(dev, page, offset, size, prot); >>> >>> if (!iommu_dma_mapping_error(dev, dev_addr) && >>> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static int __iommu_map_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, >>> __iommu_sync_sg_for_device(dev, sgl, nelems, dir); >>> >>> return iommu_dma_map_sg(dev, sgl, nelems, >>> - dma_direction_to_prot(dir, coherent)); >>> + dma_info_to_prot(dir, coherent, attrs)); >>> } >>> >>> static void __iommu_unmap_sg_attrs(struct device *dev, >>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >>> index d2a7a46..756d5e0 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c >>> @@ -182,16 +182,22 @@ int iommu_dma_init_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, dma_addr_t base, >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_dma_init_domain); >>> >>> /** >>> - * dma_direction_to_prot - Translate DMA API directions to IOMMU API page flags >>> + * dma_info_to_prot - Translate DMA API directions and attributes to IOMMU API >>> + * page flags. >>> * @dir: Direction of DMA transfer >>> * @coherent: Is the DMA master cache-coherent? >>> + * @attrs: DMA attributes for the mapping >>> * >>> * Return: corresponding IOMMU API page protection flags >>> */ >>> -int dma_direction_to_prot(enum dma_data_direction dir, bool coherent) >>> +int dma_info_to_prot(enum dma_data_direction dir, bool coherent, >>> + unsigned long attrs) >>> { >>> int prot = coherent ? IOMMU_CACHE : 0; >>> >>> + if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED) >>> + prot |= IOMMU_PRIV; >>> + >>> switch (dir) { >>> case DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL: >>> return prot | IOMMU_READ | IOMMU_WRITE; >> >> ...and applying against -next now also needs this hunk: >> >> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_resource(struct device >> *dev, phys_addr_t phys, >> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs) >> { >> return __iommu_dma_map(dev, phys, size, >> - dma_direction_to_prot(dir, false) | IOMMU_MMIO); >> + dma_info_to_prot(dir, false, attrs) | IOMMU_MMIO); >> } >> >> void iommu_dma_unmap_resource(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle, >> >> With those two issues fixed up, I've given the series (applied to >> next-20161213) a spin on a SMMUv3/PL330 fast model and it still checks out. >> > > oops, sorry that i missed this in rebase. I can repost now with this fixed, > 'checks out' you mean something is not working correct ?
No, I mean it _is_ still correct - I guess that's more of an idiom than I thought :)
Robin.
> > Regards, > Sricharan >
| |