Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:54:47 -0700 | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] doc: Explain light-handed markup preference a bit better |
| |
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 23:06:57 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Hm yeah, separate conversion section makes sense. In that case I'll > adopt Jani's suggestion for more terseness in overview document, and > we can merge Mauro's proposal (or something like it) on top. And I'll > try to rebase onto latest doc-next too ;-) > > Does that sound like a plan, before I head of and respin v4?
It sounds like a good plan to me.
jon
| |