Messages in this thread | | | From | Ard Biesheuvel <> | Date | Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:28:32 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/reloc64: add support for 32-bit CRC pseudo-symbols |
| |
On 1 December 2016 at 09:45, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote: > On 1 December 2016 at 09:39, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: >> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> writes: >>> On 25 November 2016 at 11:29, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote: >>>> Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> writes: >>>> >>>> [ 7.607687] kvm: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout >>>> [ 7.846799] virtio: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout >>>> [ 22.012615] crc32c_vpmsum: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout >>>> [ 22.012959] libcrc32c: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout >>>> >>> >>> Sigh. I suppose your modversions fixes are queued for v4.10? It's >>> probably best to revisit this after the v4.10 merge window closes >>> then, just to make sure I'm not aiming for a moving target. >> >> Actually they were merged into 4.9-rc7 ish. >> >> But I'm still seeing the same as above with this series rebased on top >> of that, and I'm a bit short on time to debug it ATM. >> >> So during the 4.10 cycle is probably the best we can hope for, sorry. >> > > Not a problem. The only question is whether 1/3 of this series fixes > an actual bug or not, given that the CONFIG_RELOCATABLE workaround has > been made ppc64 only. > > But for the remaining patches, I'm happy to respin after the v4.10 > merge window closes, and get something queued for v4.11 >
Actually, given the uncertain fate of modversions in general, we may no longer have to bother by the time the v4.11 merge window opens ...
| |