Messages in this thread | | | From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> | Date | Thu, 10 Nov 2016 02:47:47 +0100 | Subject | Re: Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK? |
| |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > Easiest thing to do would be to select 16K page size in your .config, I > think that will give you a similar sized stack.
I didn't realize that was possible...
I'm mostly concerned about the best way to deal with systems that have a limited stack size on architectures without support for separate irq stacks. Part of this I assume involves actually detecting with a processor definition that the current architecture has a deceptively small stack.
| |