lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: Assorted fixes for hierarchy mode
On 2016.11.09 at 10:10 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:10:23PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf escreveu:
> > On 2016.11.09 at 00:05 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> > > <markus@trippelsdorf.de> wrote:
> > > > On 2016.11.08 at 22:08 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > >> This patches fix problems in hierarchy output Markus reported some
> > > >> time ago. The code is available on the 'perf/hierarchy-fix-v1' branch
> > > >> in my tree:
>
> > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/namhyung/linux-perf.git
>
> > > >> Any feedbacks are welcomed.
>
> > > > By the way, I hope that:
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=8a06b0be6507f97f3aa92ca814335b8b65fd3de2
> > > > doesn't fall through the cracks.
>
> > > What do you mean? It's already in the tip/perf/core so will be merged
> > > to the mainline eventually.
>
> > Ok. I was just wondering, because it sits there for two weeks already...
>
> If you think something qualifies for perf/urgent, i.e. to go to a kernel
> that is in -rc stage, v4.9-rc4 now, for instance, please point that out
> and I'll consider it.

Because "perf top --hierarchy" is new in 4.9, I think all fixes for that
feature qualify for perf/urgent by default.

--
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-09 14:15    [W:0.043 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site