Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Nov 2016 06:53:55 -0600 | From | Jarkko Sakkinen <> | Subject | Re: [tpmdd-devel] tpm_tis regression in 4.9? |
| |
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:56:47PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:16:59PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 05:37:45PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I think this patch from Jarkko's next is the fix: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git/commit/65da72b7dd > > > > > > cdd8990e4783d09c7e86d90ccb4121 > > > > > > > > > > > > Jarkko? Can you hurry that along to go in for -rc? > > > > > > > > > > Do you think I should resend the pull request? > > > > > > > > That or a ping. This patch needs to land right away since it is breaking 4.9. > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > Jarrko, why we didn't request pull for fix Intel PTT patches, as well for 4.9? > > > > Which patches are you talking about? > > 213ebc81ac3f tmp/tpm_crb: implement runtime pm for tpm_crb > a0cb67590dff tpm/tpm_crb: open code the crb_init into acpi_add > 4d73afd9c0fd tmp/tpm_crb: fix Intel PTT hw bug during idle state > 34483fbffd83 tpm/tpm_crb: implement tpm crb idle state
I can propose these to the stable series. Not having power gating is not a kernel regression but important enough for the stable IMHO.
I wonder what is the process of proposing something to stable if you do not have a commit ID for regression?
> Thanks > Tomas
/Jarkko
| |