lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the block tree
+Jens

On 28 November 2016 at 03:12, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mmc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e806402130c9 ("block: split out request-only flags into a new namespace")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
> 95105fc9ffbb ("mmc: block: delete packed command support")
>
> from the mmc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Stephen, thanks for reporting! Just to let you know, I have today
re-based my next branch, which makes ("mmc: block: delete packed
command support") get a new commit id. Perhaps that causes you to
re-resolve the conflict, then apologize for the inconvenience.

Jens, Christoph, I believe I said this before; could you please make
sure patches for mmc also becomes cc:ed to me?
Don't get me wrong, I have no problem you carrying changes for mmc,
especially clean-ups like this one, but it just be nice to be aware of
what goes on.

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index ae9cbe6101be,86ff28f84698..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@@ -2114,28 -1728,18 +1728,18 @@@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct m
> return 1;
>
> cmd_abort:
> - if (mmc_packed_cmd(mq_rq->cmd_type)) {
> - mmc_blk_abort_packed_req(mq_rq);
> - } else {
> - if (mmc_card_removed(card))
> - req->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET;
> - while (ret)
> - ret = blk_end_request(req, -EIO,
> - blk_rq_cur_bytes(req));
> - }
> + if (mmc_card_removed(card))
> - req->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
> ++ req->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET;
> + while (ret)
> + ret = blk_end_request(req, -EIO,
> + blk_rq_cur_bytes(req));
>
> start_new_req:
> if (rqc) {
> if (mmc_card_removed(card)) {
> - rqc->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUIET;
> + rqc->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET;
> blk_end_request_all(rqc, -EIO);
> } else {
> - /*
> - * If current request is packed, it needs to put back.
> - */
> - if (mmc_packed_cmd(mq->mqrq_cur->cmd_type))
> - mmc_blk_revert_packed_req(mq, mq->mqrq_cur);
> -
> mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq);
> mmc_start_req(card->host,
> &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active, NULL);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-29 10:14    [W:0.050 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site