lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH/RFC] add "failfast" support for raid1/raid10.
On Sat, Nov 19 2016, Jack Wang wrote:

> 2016-11-18 6:16 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
>> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
>> really like some of the details.
>>
>> So I'm posting them as RFC in the hope that a different perspective
>> might help me like them better, or find a better approach.
>>
>> The core idea is that when you have multiple copies of data
>> (i.e. mirrored drives) it doesn't make sense to wait for a read from
>> a drive that seems to be having problems. It will probably be faster
>> to just cancel that read, and read from the other device.
>> Similarly, in some circumstances, it might be better to fail a drive
>> that is being slow to respond to writes, rather than cause all writes
>> to be very slow.
>>
>> The particular context where this comes up is when mirroring across
>> storage arrays, where the storage arrays can temporarily take an
>> unusually long time to respond to requests (firmware updates have
>> been mentioned). As the array will have redundancy internally, there
>> is little risk to the data. The mirrored pair is really only for
>> disaster recovery, and it is deemed better to lose the last few
>> minutes of updates in the case of a serious disaster, rather than
>> occasionally having latency issues because one array needs to do some
>> maintenance for a few minutes. The particular storage arrays in
>> question are DASD devices which are part of the s390 ecosystem.
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thanks for pushing this feature also to mainline.
> We at Profitbricks use raid1 across IB network, one pserver with
> raid1, both legs on 2 remote storages.
> We've noticed if one remote storage crash , and raid1 still keep
> sending IO to the faulty leg, even after 5 minutes,
> md still redirect I/Os, and md refuse to remove active disks, eg:

That make sense. It cannot remove the active disk until all pending IO
completes, either with an error or with success.

If the target has a long timeout, that can delay progress a lot.

>
> I tried to port you patch from SLES[1], with the patchset, it reduce
> the time to ~30 seconds.
>
> I'm happy to see this feature upstream :)
> I will test again this new patchset.

Thanks for your confirmation that this is more generally useful than I
thought, and I'm always happy to hear for more testing :-)

Thanks,
NeilBrown
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-24 05:48    [W:0.097 / U:29.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site