lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 05/46] perf/x86/intel/cmt: add per-package locks
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:

> > Also, "monr" is a horribly 'word'.
>
> What makes it so bad? (honest question) . Some alternatives:
>
> - res_mon, resm, rmon (Resource Monitor)
> - rmnode, rnode, rmon_node (Resource Monitoring node, similar to
> Resource Monitor ID, but to reflect that it's a node in a
> tree/hierarchy)
> - rdt_mon, rdtm (something with RDT + Monitoring)
> - ment, rdt_ment (Monitoring Entity)
>
> Other suggestions?

The naming is the least of my worries right now. Before you start to rework
the series can we please get the information about:

- what you want to achieve and why

- the design of your approach

so we can avoid staring at another series of 40+ patches just to figure out
that something is wrong at the conceptual level?

We sort out the naming convention once we are done with the above.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-16 20:03    [W:0.168 / U:0.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site