lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks with `kswapd` and `mem_cgroup_shrink_node`
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:01:19PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Linux folks,
>
>
> On 11/08/16 19:39, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:38:18PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >>On 11/08/16 18:03, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >>
> >>>>Could you please help me shedding some light into the messages below?
> >>>>
> >>>>With Linux 4.4.X, these messages were not seen. When updating to
> >>>>Linux 4.8.4, and Linux 4.8.6 they started to appear. In that
> >>>>version, we enabled several CGROUP options.
> >>>>
> >>>>>$ dmesg -T
> >>>>>[…]
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] 3-...: (493 ticks this GP) idle=515/140000000000000/0 softirq=5504423/5504423 fqs=13876
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] (detected by 5, t=60002 jiffies, g=1363193, c=1363192, q=268508)
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] Task dump for CPU 3:
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] kswapd1 R running task 0 87 2 0x00000008
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] ffffffff81aabdfd ffff8810042a5cb8 ffff88080ad34000 ffff88080ad33dc8
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] ffff88080ad33d00 0000000000003501 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000022316 000000000002bc9f
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] Call Trace:
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff81aabdfd>] ? __schedule+0x21d/0x5b0
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff81106dcf>] ? shrink_node+0xbf/0x1c0
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff81107865>] ? kswapd+0x315/0x5f0
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff81107550>] ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x90/0x90
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff8106c614>] ? kthread+0xc4/0xe0
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff81aaf64f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> >>>>>[Mon Nov 7 15:09:45 2016] [<ffffffff8106c550>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x160/0x160
> >>>>
> >>>>Even after reading `stallwarn.txt` [1], I don’t know what could
> >>>>cause this. All items in the backtrace seem to belong to the Linux
> >>>>kernel.
> >>>>
> >>>>There is also nothing suspicious in the monitoring graphs during that time.
> >>>
> >>>If you let it be, do you get a later stall warning a few minutes later?
> >>>If so, how does the stack trace compare?
> >>
> >>With Linux 4.8.6 this is the only occurrence since yesterday.
> >>
> >>With Linux 4.8.3, and 4.8.4 the following stack traces were seen.
> >
> >Looks to me like one or both of the loops in shrink_node() need
> >an cond_resched_rcu_qs().
>
> Thank you for the pointer. I haven’t had time yet to look into it.

In theory, it is quite straightforward, as shown by the patch below.
In practice, the MM guys might wish to call cond_resched_rcu_qs() less
frequently, but I will leave that to their judgment. My guess is that
the overhead of the cond_resched_rcu_qs() is way down in the noise,
but I have been surprised in the past.

Anyway, please give this patch a try and let me know how it goes.

Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 1a5595eec6c034c27e1c826a93292240bfea934e
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed Nov 16 09:26:28 2016 -0800

mm: Prevent shrink_node() RCU CPU stall warnings

This commit adds a couple cond_resched_rcu_qs() calls in the inner
loop in shrink_node() in order to prevent RCU CPU stall warnings.

Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 744f926af442..0d3b5f5a04ef 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2529,8 +2529,11 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
unsigned long scanned;

if (mem_cgroup_low(root, memcg)) {
- if (!sc->may_thrash)
+ if (!sc->may_thrash) {
+ /* Prevent CPU CPU stalls. */
+ cond_resched_rcu_qs();
continue;
+ }
mem_cgroup_events(memcg, MEMCG_LOW, 1);
}

@@ -2565,6 +2568,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg);
break;
}
+ cond_resched_rcu_qs(); /* Prevent CPU CPU stalls. */
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim)));

/*
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-16 18:30    [W:2.232 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site