Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] tpm: cleanup/fixes in existing event log support | From | Nayna <> | Date | Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:05:42 +0530 |
| |
On 11/15/2016 07:45 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:25:14PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:33:23PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 05:00:47AM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: >>>> This patch set includes the cleanup and bug fixes patches, previously >>>> part of the "tpm: add the securityfs pseudo files support for TPM 2.0 >>>> firmware event log" patch set, in order to upstream them more quickly. >>> >>> I applied the patches. I'm not yet sure whether these are part of the >>> 4.10 pull request or whether I postpone to 4.11 (my preference would be >>> 4.10 but I do not want to close that right now). I'll do testing next >>> week before doing pull request. >>> >>> I hope that the commits gets some reviews and testing now that they are >>> easily testable in my master branch. >> >> Event log still works and they do not seem to break TPM 2.0 (tried both >> machine with tpm_crb and tpm_tis). >> >> Stefan: would you mind check that these do not break your TPM 1.2 >> environment? I already tried wih TPM 1.2 machine but probably would >> make sense to peer test. > > I'm dropping commits 8/9 and 9/9 from my tree and *will not* include > them to my 4.10 pull request.
Will fix this and resend the patch 8/9 and 9/9 again.
Thanks & Regards, - Nayna
> > /Jarkko >
| |