lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 1/9] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device
On 10-11-16, 16:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:34:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 09-11-16, 14:58, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:02:56PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > > > + Entries for multiple regulators shall be provided in the same field separated
> > > > + by angular brackets <>. The OPP binding doesn't provide any provisions to
> > > > + relate the values to their power supplies or the order in which the supplies
> > > > + need to be configured.
>
> > > I don't understand how this works. If we have an unordered list of
> > > values to set for regulators how will we make sense of them?
>
> > The platform driver is responsible to identify the order and pass it on to the
> > OPP core. And the platform driver needs to have that hard coded.
>
> That *really* should be in the binding.

Okay, how do you suggest doing that? Will a property like supply-names
in the OPP table be fine? Like this:

@@ -369,13 +378,16 @@ Example 4: Handling multiple regulators
compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
...

- cpu-supply = <&cpu_supply0>, <&cpu_supply1>, <&cpu_supply2>;
+ vcc0-supply = <&cpu_supply0>;
+ vcc1-supply = <&cpu_supply1>;
+ vcc2-supply = <&cpu_supply2>;
operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
};
};

cpu0_opp_table: opp_table0 {
compatible = "operating-points-v2";
+ supply-names = "vcc0", "vcc1", "vcc2";
opp-shared;

--
viresh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-11-10 19:10    [W:0.183 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site