Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Oct 2016 11:04:12 +0200 | From | Maxime Ripard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings |
| |
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > > +bindings. > > Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all.
Yep, I'll add that.
Thanks! Maxime
-- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |