Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk: introduce kptr_restrict level 3 | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:19:48 -0700 |
| |
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:00 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> And based on my read of this thread, we all appear to be in violent > agreement. :) "always protect %p" is absolutely the goal, and we can > figure out the best way to get there.
I proposed emitting pointers from the const and text sections by default and using NULL for data pointers.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/5/380
| |