Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.7 114/141] lib/test_hash.c: fix warning in preprocessor symbol evaluation | Date | Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:29:10 +0200 |
| |
4.7-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
commit e6173ba42bbdba05fd4f3021c0beda0506271507 upstream.
Some versions of gcc don't like tests for the value of an undefined preprocessor symbol, even in the #else branch of an #ifndef:
lib/test_hash.c:224:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:229:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 ^ lib/test_hash.c:234:7: warning: "HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64" is not defined [-Wundef] #elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 ^
Seen with gcc 4.9, not seen with 4.1.2.
Change the logic to only check the value inside an #ifdef to fix this.
Fixes: 468a9428521e7d00 ("<linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160829214952.1334674-4-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- lib/test_hash.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_hash.c +++ b/lib/test_hash.c @@ -219,21 +219,27 @@ test_hash_init(void) } /* Issue notices about skipped tests. */ -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 - pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); -#elif HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 +#if HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 != 1 pr_info("__hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); #endif -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 - pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); -#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 +#else + pr_info("__hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); +#endif +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 +#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_32 != 1 pr_info("hash_32() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); #endif -#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 - pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test."); -#elif HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 +#else + pr_info("hash_32() has no arch implementation to test."); +#endif +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 +#if HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 != 1 pr_info("hash_64() is arch-specific; not compared to generic."); #endif +#else + pr_info("hash_64() has no arch implementation to test."); +#endif pr_notice("%u tests passed.", tests);
| |