lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 2/5] firmware: encapsulate firmware loading status
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
>
> On 09/09/2016 02:12 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >The firmware user helper code tracks the current state of the loading
> >process via unsigned long status and a complection in struct
> >firmware_buf. We only need this for the usermode helper as such we can
> >encapsulate all this data into its own data structure.
>
> I don't think we are able to move the completion code into a
> CONFIG_FW_LOADER_HELPER section. The direct loading path uses
> completion as well.

Where?

> >+#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> >+
> >+enum {
> >+ FW_UMH_UNKNOWN,
> >+ FW_UMH_LOADING,
> >+ FW_UMH_DONE,
> >+ FW_UMH_ABORTED,
> >+};
>
> The direct loading path just uses two states, LOADING and DONE.
> ABORTED is not used.
>
> >+struct fw_umh {
> >+ struct completion completion;
> >+ unsigned long status;
> >+};
> >+
> >+static void fw_umh_init(struct fw_umh *fw_umh)
> >+{
> >+ init_completion(&fw_umh->completion);
> >+ fw_umh->status = FW_UMH_UNKNOWN;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int __fw_umh_check(struct fw_umh *fw_umh, unsigned long status)
> >+{
> >+ return test_bit(status, &fw_umh->status);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int fw_umh_wait_timeout(struct fw_umh *fw_umh, long timeout)
> >+{
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&fw_umh->completion,
> >+ timeout);
> >+ if (ret != 0 && test_bit(FW_UMH_ABORTED, &fw_umh->status))
> >+ return -ENOENT;
> >+
> >+ return ret;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static void __fw_umh_set(struct fw_umh *fw_umh,
> >+ unsigned long status)
> >+{
> >+ set_bit(status, &fw_umh->status);
> >+
> >+ if (status == FW_UMH_DONE || status == FW_UMH_ABORTED) {
> >+ clear_bit(FW_UMH_LOADING, &fw_umh->status);
> >+ complete_all(&fw_umh->completion);
> >+ }
> >+}
> >+
> >+#define fw_umh_start(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_set(fw_umh, FW_UMH_LOADING)
> >+#define fw_umh_done(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_set(fw_umh, FW_UMH_DONE)
> >+#define fw_umh_aborted(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_set(fw_umh, FW_UMH_ABORTED)
> >+#define fw_umh_is_loading(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_check(fw_umh, FW_UMH_LOADING)
> >+#define fw_umh_is_done(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_check(fw_umh, FW_UMH_DONE)
> >+#define fw_umh_is_aborted(fw_umh) \
> >+ __fw_umh_check(fw_umh, FW_UMH_ABORTED)
> >+
> >+#else /* CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER */
> >+
> >+#define fw_umh_wait_timeout(fw_st, long) 0
> >+
> >+#define fw_umh_done(fw_st)
> >+#define fw_umh_is_done(fw_st) true
> >+#define fw_umh_is_aborted(fw_st) false
>
> We still need the implementation for fw_umh_wait_timeout() and
> fw_umh_start(), fw_umh_done() etc.

Why?

> fw_umh_is_aborted() is not
> needed.
>
>
> >@@ -309,8 +373,7 @@ static void fw_finish_direct_load(struct device *device,
> > struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > {
> > mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> >- set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status);
> >- complete_all(&buf->completion);
> >+ fw_umh_done(&buf->fw_umh);
> > mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > }
>
> Here we signal that we have loaded the firmware

The struct firmware_buf is only used for the sysfs stuff no?

> > /* wait until the shared firmware_buf becomes ready (or error) */
> > static int sync_cached_firmware_buf(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> > {
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> >- while (!test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status)) {
> >- if (is_fw_load_aborted(buf)) {
> >+ while (!fw_umh_is_done(&buf->fw_umh)) {
> >+ if (fw_umh_is_aborted(&buf->fw_umh)) {
> > ret = -ENOENT;
> > break;
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> >- ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&buf->completion);
> >+ ret = fw_umh_wait_timeout(&buf->fw_umh, 0);
> > mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > }
>
> and here we here we wait for it.

Likewise.

Luis

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-05 22:28    [W:0.099 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site