lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: kernel v4.8: iptables logs are truncated with the 4.8 kernel?
Hi Justin,

2016-10-05 6:02 GMT+08:00 Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>:
> Hello,
>
> kernel 4.8 with ulogd-2.0.5- IPs are no longer logged:
>
> Oct 4 17:51:30 atom INPUT_BLOCK IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:1b:21:9c:3b:fa:3e:94:d5:d2:49:1e:08:00 LEN=0 TOS=00 PREC=0x00
> TTL=0 ID=0 PROTO=0 MARK=0
> Oct 4 17:51:31 atom INPUT_BLOCK IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:1b:21:9c:3b:fa:3e:94:d5:d2:49:1e:08:00 LEN=0 TOS=00 PREC=0x00
> TTL=0 ID=0 PROTO=0 MARK=0
> Oct 4 17:51:32 atom INPUT_BLOCK IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:1b:21:9c:3b:fa:3e:94:d5:d2:49:1e:08:00 LEN=0 TOS=00 PREC=0x00
> TTL=0 ID=0 PROTO=0 MARK=0
>
> (reboot back to kernel 4.7, works fine)
>
> kernel 4.7 with ulogd-2.0.5:
> Oct 4 17:56:44 atom INPUT_BLOCK IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:1b:21:9c:3b:fa:3e:94:d5:d2:49:1e:08:00 SRC=74.125.22.125
> DST=1.2.3.4 LEN=397 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=58093 PROTO=TCP
> SPT=5222 DPT=19804 SEQ=2032644254 ACK=2273184383 WINDOW=55272 ACK PSH
> URGP=0 MARK=0
> Oct 4 17:56:45 atom INPUT_BLOCK IN=eth1 OUT=
> MAC=00:1b:21:9c:3b:fa:3e:94:d5:d2:49:1e:08:00 SRC=74.125.22.125
> DST=1.2.3.4 LEN=397 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=48 ID=58725 PROTO=TCP
> SPT=5222 DPT=19804 SEQ=2032644254 ACK=2273184383 WINDOW=55272 ACK PSH
> URGP=0 MARK=0
>
> Looks like there were some changes in the 4.8 kernel regarding ulogd,
> has anyone else run into this problem?
>
> } ulog;
> + if ((li->u.ulog.flags & NF_LOG_F_COPY_LEN) &&
> + (li->u.ulog.copy_len < data_len))
> + data_len = li->u.ulog.copy_len;
> li->u.ulog.group = ntohs(nla_get_be16(tb[NFTA_LOG_GROUP]));
> + li->u.ulog.flags |= NF_LOG_F_COPY_LEN;
> li->u.ulog.copy_len =
> if (nla_put_be16(skb, NFTA_LOG_GROUP, htons(li->u.ulog.group)))
> - if (li->u.ulog.copy_len) {
> + if (li->u.ulog.flags & NF_LOG_F_COPY_LEN) {
> htonl(li->u.ulog.copy_len)))
> li.u.ulog.group = info->group;
> li.u.ulog.qthreshold = info->threshold;
> + li.u.ulog.flags |= NF_LOG_F_COPY_LEN;
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin.

Which one are you using? iptables or nftables?

Could you please paste the related iptables/nftables rules here?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-05 03:00    [W:0.062 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site