Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Walleij <> | Date | Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:17:45 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: add a comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass |
| |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> This is a follow-up to commit 559b46990e76 ("gpio: pca953x: fix an >> incorrect lockdep warning"). The reason for calling >> lockdep_set_subclass() in pca953x_probe() is not explained in >> the code. >> >> Add a comment describing the problem, partial solution and required >> future extensions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> > > Linus, because of dependencies, I should probably pick it up?
Yes Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Sorry was travelling.
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |