lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: expose AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS features to kvm guest
From
Date


On 28/10/2016 12:13, Luc, Piotr wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 17:12 +0800, He Chen wrote:
>> The spec can be found in Intel Software Developer Manual or in
>> Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index afa7bbb..328b169 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -376,6 +376,10 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct
>> kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>> /* cpuid 7.0.ecx*/
>> const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features = F(PKU) | 0
>> /*OSPKE*/;
>>
>> + /* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
>> + const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
>> + 0x4 /* AVX512-4VNNIW */ | 0x8 /* AVX512-4FMAPS */;
>> +
>> /* all calls to cpuid_count() should be made on the same cpu
>> */
>> get_cpu();
>>
>> @@ -458,12 +462,13 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct
>> kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>> /* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow
>> paging. */
>> if (!tdp_enabled)
>> entry->ecx &= ~F(PKU);
>> + entry->edx &= kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features;
>
> The cpu_mask() is missed here.
> I understand that it doesn't work for this scattered features but the
> bits in edx must be zeroed if corresponding flags were cleared in
> fpu__xstate_clear_all_cpu_caps.
> So this implies more work unfortunately.

So if the x86 folks would retract their objection and accept a new
cpufeature array element it would be nice, because KVM could just do

cpuid_mask(&entry->edx, CPUID_7_0_EDX);

Otherwise, if you add a cpuid_count_edx function to processor.h then one
can do:

entry_>edx &= cpuid_count_edx(7, 0);

which is decent too.

Thanks,

Paolo

>> } else {
>> entry->ebx = 0;
>> entry->ecx = 0;
>> + entry->edx = 0;
>> }
>> entry->eax = 0;
>> - entry->edx = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> case 9:

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-28 12:17    [W:0.460 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site