lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Use the resource-managed function to add devfreq device
On 2016-10-26 00:38, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch uses the resource-managed to add the devfreq device.
> This function will make it easy to handle the devfreq device.
>
> - struct devfreq *devm_devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
> struct devfreq_dev_profile *profile,
> const char *governor_name,
> void *data);
> Cc: Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@gmail.com>
> Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index f08d41a2d70b..e639071fd3a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -6198,8 +6198,6 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> scsi_host_put(hba->host);
>
> ufshcd_exit_clk_gating(hba);
> - if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_enabled(hba))
> - devfreq_remove_device(hba->devfreq);
> ufshcd_hba_exit(hba);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufshcd_remove);
> @@ -6495,7 +6493,7 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
> }
>
> if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_enabled(hba)) {
> - hba->devfreq = devfreq_add_device(dev, &ufs_devfreq_profile,
> + hba->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, &ufs_devfreq_profile,
> "simple_ondemand", NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(hba->devfreq)) {
> dev_err(hba->dev, "Unable to register with devfreq %ld\n",

This change looks good to me but this will have merge conflicts if this
gets in after my patch series " [PATCH v1 00/11] scsi: ufs: bug fixes
patch series #1" (due to "[PATCH v1 06/11] scsi: ufs: suspend clock
scaling for failed runtime_resume"). so if you can, please pull in my
patch series and rebase your change on top of it and send it out again.

Thanks,
Subhash

--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-26 19:23    [W:0.042 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site