Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:14:02 -0700 | From | Jessica Yu <> | Subject | Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling |
| |
+++ Jiri Kosina [26/10/16 10:17 +0200]: >On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the >> >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency >> >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's >> >> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do >> >> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's >> >> approval :-)), no? >> > >> > I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't >> > reposnded so far. >> >> I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her >> Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree. > >Awesome! :) > >> Lazy, huh? > >Laziness has always been the main power behind all the progress of the >mankind :P > >Jessica, do you want me to take the patch through livepatching tree still, >or would you route it yourself now?
Hi Jiri,
Once I'm done fumbling with maintainership logistics, I will take this patch through my tree. :-)
Thanks, Jessica
| |