Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:47:47 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] stop_machine: yield CPU during stop machine |
| |
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:52:31AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Peter, I will fixup the patch set (I forgot to remove the lowlatency > in 2 places) and push it on my tree for linux-next. Lets see what happens. > Would the tip tree be the right place if things work out ok?
I think so, you're touching a fair bit of kernel/locking/ and there's bound to be some conflicts with work there. So carrying it in the locking tree might be best.
| |