lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next 1/2] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add support for F55 sensor tuning
From
Date
Hi Guenter,

I have a couple of comments below.

On 09/30/2016 08:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Sensor tuning support is needed to determine the number of enabled
> tx and rx electrodes for use in F54 functions.
>
> The number of enabled electrodes is not identical to the total number
> of electrodes as reported with F55:Query0 and F55:Query1. It has to be
> calculated by analyzing F55:Ctrl1 (sensor receiver assignment) and
> F55:Ctrl2 (sensor transmitter assignment).
>
> Support for additional sensor tuning functions may be added later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> This patch applies to next-20160930.
>
> drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig | 9 +++
> drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c | 3 +
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h | 1 +
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f55.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f55.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig b/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> index 4c8a55857e00..11ede43c9936 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/Kconfig
> @@ -72,3 +72,12 @@ config RMI4_F54
>
> Function 54 provides access to various diagnostic features in certain
> RMI4 touch sensors.
> +
> +config RMI4_F55
> + bool "RMI4 Function 55 (Sensor tuning)"
> + depends on RMI4_CORE
> + help
> + Say Y here if you want to add support for RMI4 function 55
> +
> + Function 55 provides access to the RMI4 touch sensor tuning
> + mechanism.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile b/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> index 0bafc8502c4b..96f8e0c21e3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F11) += rmi_f11.o
> rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F12) += rmi_f12.o
> rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F30) += rmi_f30.o
> rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F54) += rmi_f54.o
> +rmi_core-$(CONFIG_RMI4_F55) += rmi_f55.o
>
> # Transports
> obj-$(CONFIG_RMI4_I2C) += rmi_i2c.o
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> index ef8c747c35e7..82b7d4960858 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> @@ -314,6 +314,9 @@ static struct rmi_function_handler *fn_handlers[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_RMI4_F54
> &rmi_f54_handler,
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RMI4_F55
> + &rmi_f55_handler,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static void __rmi_unregister_function_handlers(int start_idx)
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> index 8dfbebe9bf86..a65cf70f61e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.h
> @@ -103,4 +103,5 @@ extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f11_handler;
> extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f12_handler;
> extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f30_handler;
> extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f54_handler;
> +extern struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f55_handler;
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f55.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f55.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..268fa904205a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f55.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2012-2015 Synaptics Incorporated
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Zodiac Inflight Innovations
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>

This is incidental, but I don't think i2c.h needs to be included here
since this file shouldn't contain anything i2c specific. Its not that
big a deal, but I noticed it so I thought I would mention it.

> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/rmi.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include "rmi_driver.h"
> +
> +#define F55_NAME "rmi4_f55"
> +
> +/* F55 data offsets */
> +#define F55_NUM_RX_OFFSET 0
> +#define F55_NUM_TX_OFFSET 1
> +#define F55_PHYS_CHAR_OFFSET 2
> +
> +/* Fixed sizes of reports */
> +#define F55_QUERY_LEN 17

How did you chose the number 17? The number of F55 query registers
present will depend on how the firmware is configured so the total
length of query registers can change. Right now this driver is only
using the first three F55 query registers which will always be present
so that not an issue. But, beyond query 2 not all query registers are
guaranteed to be present.

Everything else looks correct.

Andrew

> +
> +/* F55 capabilities */
> +#define F55_CAP_SENSOR_ASSIGN BIT(0)
> +
> +struct f55_data {
> + struct rmi_function *fn;
> +
> + u8 qry[F55_QUERY_LEN];
> + u8 num_rx_electrodes;
> + u8 cfg_num_rx_electrodes;
> + u8 num_tx_electrodes;
> + u8 cfg_num_tx_electrodes;
> +};
> +
> +static int rmi_f55_detect(struct rmi_function *fn)
> +{
> + struct f55_data *f55;
> + int error;
> +
> + f55 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> +
> + error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev, fn->fd.query_base_addr,
> + &f55->qry, sizeof(f55->qry));
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&fn->dev, "%s: Failed to query F55 properties\n",
> + __func__);
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + f55->num_rx_electrodes = f55->qry[F55_NUM_RX_OFFSET];
> + f55->num_tx_electrodes = f55->qry[F55_NUM_TX_OFFSET];
> +
> + f55->cfg_num_rx_electrodes = f55->num_rx_electrodes;
> + f55->cfg_num_tx_electrodes = f55->num_rx_electrodes;
> +
> + if (f55->qry[F55_PHYS_CHAR_OFFSET] & F55_CAP_SENSOR_ASSIGN) {
> + int i, total;
> + u8 buf[256];
> +
> + /*
> + * Calculate the number of enabled receive and transmit
> + * electrodes by reading F55:Ctrl1 (sensor receiver assignment)
> + * and F55:Ctrl2 (sensor transmitter assignment). The number of
> + * enabled electrodes is the sum of all field entries with a
> + * value other than 0xff.
> + */
> + error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev,
> + fn->fd.control_base_addr + 1,
> + buf, f55->num_rx_electrodes);
> + if (!error) {
> + total = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < f55->num_rx_electrodes; i++) {
> + if (buf[i] != 0xff)
> + total++;
> + }
> + f55->cfg_num_rx_electrodes = total;
> + }
> +
> + error = rmi_read_block(fn->rmi_dev,
> + fn->fd.control_base_addr + 2,
> + buf, f55->num_tx_electrodes);
> + if (!error) {
> + total = 0;
> + for (i = 0; i < f55->num_tx_electrodes; i++) {
> + if (buf[i] != 0xff)
> + total++;
> + }
> + f55->cfg_num_tx_electrodes = total;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &fn->dev, "F55 num_rx_electrodes: %d (raw %d)\n",
> + f55->cfg_num_rx_electrodes, f55->num_rx_electrodes);
> + rmi_dbg(RMI_DEBUG_FN, &fn->dev, "F55 num_tx_electrodes: %d (raw %d)\n",
> + f55->cfg_num_tx_electrodes, f55->num_tx_electrodes);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rmi_f55_probe(struct rmi_function *fn)
> +{
> + struct f55_data *f55;
> +
> + f55 = devm_kzalloc(&fn->dev, sizeof(struct f55_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!f55)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + f55->fn = fn;
> + dev_set_drvdata(&fn->dev, f55);
> +
> + return rmi_f55_detect(fn);
> +}
> +
> +struct rmi_function_handler rmi_f55_handler = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = F55_NAME,
> + },
> + .func = 0x55,
> + .probe = rmi_f55_probe,
> +};


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-25 02:59    [W:2.274 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site