lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 4/4] drm/fence: add out-fences support
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:55:38PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-10-20 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:50:05PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Support DRM out-fences by creating a sync_file with a fence for each CRTC
> > > that sets the OUT_FENCE_PTR property.
> >
> > I still maintain the out fence should also be per fb (well, per plane
> > since we can't add it to fbs). Otherwise it's not going to be at all
> > useful if you do fps>vrefresh and don't include the same set of planes
> > in every atomic ioctl, eg. if you only ever include ones that are
> > somehow dirty.
>
> How would the kernel signal these dirty planes then? Right now we signal
> at the vblank.

So if I think about it in terms of the previous fbs something like this
comes to mind:

starting point:
plane a, fb 0
plane b, fb 1

ioctl:
plane a, fb 2, fence A
plane b, fb 3, fence B

ioctl:
plane a, fb 4, fence C
-> fb 2 can be reused, so fence C should signal immediately?

vblank:
-> fb 0,1 can be reused, so fence A,B signal?

It feels a bit wonky since the fence is effectively associated with the
previous fb after the previous fb was already submitted to the kernel.
One might assume fence A to be the one signalled early, but that would
give the impression that fb 0 would be free for reuse when it's not.

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-20 18:36    [W:0.055 / U:4.508 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site