lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue
On Mon, 10 Oct, at 06:09:14PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-10-10 18:01 GMT+08:00 Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>:
> > On Sun, 09 Oct, at 11:39:27AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> >>
> >> The difference between this patch and Peterz's is your patch have a
> >> delta since activate_task()->enqueue_task() does do update_rq_clock(),
> >> so why don't have the delta will cause low cpu machines (4 or 8) to
> >> regress against your another reply in this thread?
> >
> > Both my patch and Peter's patch cause issues with low cpu machines. In
> > <20161004201105.GP16071@codeblueprint.co.uk> I said,
> >
> > "This patch causes some low cpu machines (4 or 8) to regress. It turns
> > out they regress with my patch too."
> >
> > Have I misunderstood your question?
>
> I compare this one https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147446511924571
> with Peterz's patch.

Oh. Low cpu machines probably do regress with my patch. At least, I
can't find the notes to prove that they don't.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-10-11 12:28    [W:2.043 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site