Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:49:21 -0500 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support |
| |
Hello, Parav.
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:16:59AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Let me think through it. Its been late night for me currently. So dont > want to conclude in hurry.
Sure thing.
> At high level it looks doable by maintaining hash table head on per > device basis, that further reduces hash contention by one level. > I will get back on this tomorrow.
Hmmm... why would it need a hash table? Let's say there's a struct rdma_device for each rdma_device and then that stuct can simply have rdma_device->res_table[] or whatever to track limits and consumptions and rdma_device->res_enabled mask to tell which resources are enabled on the device.
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |